Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is slightly better than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, having a general score of 97.6 against 93.3. Despite of the fact Galaxy Fold is older and way heavier than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. The Galaxy Fold counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, and Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a more powerful CPU than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lower number of cores and 6 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone 13 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy Fold counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro. Both of them have a F1.5 aperture, the same video frame rates, the same video quality and a 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy Fold has much more storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Apple iPhone 13 Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.