Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, blue and white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | PLS |
| 457 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Galaxy M12, with a 93.3 score against 80. IPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy M12 counts with Android 10 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro design is noticeably thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy M12, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior processing power than Galaxy M12, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a greater amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy M12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a lot higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy M12 has a much greater memory for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy M12 counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy M12 has a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rate and a much tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.