Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 457 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy M51, getting a global score of 93.3 against 87.7. Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy M51 works with Android 10 operating system. Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy M51.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 13 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
Galaxy M51 has a better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera.
Galaxy M51 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 126% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.