Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is much better than Galaxy Note 5, having a 93.3 score against 79.3. The iPhone 13 Pro design has the same thickness than the Galaxy Note 5, but it is somewhat heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy Note 5 works with Android 5.1 OS. Galaxy Note 5 features a screen that's just as good as the iPhone 13 Pro one, because although the Galaxy Note 5 has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
IPhone 13 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory, 5 more CPU cores and a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3095mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 5 and iPhone 13 Pro both feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Note 5 has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The iPhone 13 Pro is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.