Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy S10's 88.3 general score. IPhone 13 Pro is a a lot newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S10, but it's noticeably heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy S10 works with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 13 Pro has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10, although it has a quite lower 1170 x 2532px resolution and a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, they both have a screen with the same size.
Galaxy S10 has just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro. Both of them have a F1.5 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy S10 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a little longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S10. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S10, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.