Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 457 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, with a 93.3 score against 89.7. Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, but it's also just a bit heavier. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 13 Pro features a better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.