Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy S10e's general score of 86.3. Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a way newer and just a little thinner phone than the Galaxy S10e, but it is also incredibly heavier. IPhone 13 Pro has a better processor than Galaxy S10e, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 resolution, a bit better screen density and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10e captures slightly better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro. They have the same video definition, the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy S10e has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10e has a bit superior battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 3100mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S10e. If you want to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S10e, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.