Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2022-01-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy S21 FE, getting a general score of 93.3 against 89.1. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S21 FE counts with Android 11 OS. Even though iPhone 13 Pro and Galaxy S21 FE were released only a couple months apart, iPhone 13 Pro's design is a little bit thinner but heavier.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a bit better number of pixels per inch of display. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lesser cores (but faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Galaxy S21 FE features as much memory for apps and games as Apple iPhone 13 Pro, both have the same internal storage. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 45% greater battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S21 FE, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S21 FE. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S21 FE, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.