Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is slightly better than iPhone 13 Pro, having a 95.4 score against 93.3. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than iPhone 13 Pro, we must note that it is also heavier and thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with Android 13 OS, and iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 2 less cores and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a brighter display, a little larger screen, a little greater pixels number per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better video resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Apple iPhone 13 Pro one, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 62 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is more expensive than the iPhone 13 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone 13 Pro. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and get the iPhone 13 Pro, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.