Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Blue and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. The iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S5 Sport works with Android 4.4.2 OS. The iPhone 13 Pro body is extremely newer and thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a just a bit greater screen pixel density, a larger screen and a higher 1170 x 2532 resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro has a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM, 2 more processing cores and a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a way worse 12 MP resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3095mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.