Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. The iPhone 13 Pro design is notably newer and much thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's also a little heavier. IPhone 13 Pro has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 64-bits CPU, a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a quite lower pixel number per inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a bigger display. The iPhone 13 Pro features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3095mAh. Apple iPhone 13 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and higher video frame rates.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.