Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a global score of 93.3 against 80.1. IPhone 13 Pro is a newer phone, and it's also a lot lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower display density and a bit worse 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone 13 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same diafragm aperture, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a much better 3840x2160 video quality. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Apple iPhone 13 Pro is also a bit cheaper, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.