Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a global score of 93.3 against 81. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
IPhone 13 Pro features a better processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a larger amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 13 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.