Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a general score of 93.3 against 88.5. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip comes with Android 12 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro features a more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less RAM and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 13 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.