Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's overall score of 85.6. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy Z Flip 3 works with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 13 Pro body is a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Z Flip 3. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a better performing CPU than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 13 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little higher pixels count in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Apple iPhone 13 Pro both have similar memory for games and applications, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit superior battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Apple iPhone 13 Pro is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.