Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, getting a score of 93.3 against 92.3. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with Android 11 OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's design is newer than Galaxy Z Flip 5G's, although it is a little thicker and heavier.
IPhone 13 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a quite greater pixels count per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 12 megapixels resolution back camera and the same video frame rate.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 7% bigger battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy Z Flip 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.