Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than iPhone 13 Pro, having a 94.6 score against 93.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is just a little thinner than the iPhone 13 Pro, although it's way heavier and was released just a little further than a year before. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 operating system, while iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
IPhone 13 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the iPhone 13 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the iPhone 13 Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and buy the iPhone 13 Pro, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.