Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Sony |
| iOS 15.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's score of 79. The iPhone 13 Pro design is notably newer and a lot thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact. The iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Xperia XZ2 Compact works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and 2 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 13 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with much more brightness, a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 19 megapixels resolution.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 400 GB. IPhone 13 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.