Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 overall score. Even though iPhone 13 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T were released only a couple months apart, iPhone 13 Pro's construction is just a bit heavier but thinner. The iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with Android 10 OS.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has 2 less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor and more RAM. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel number in each inch in the display and a slightly higher 1170 x 2532px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs in low light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.