Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a 93.3 score against 80.2. The iPhone 13 Pro body is notably newer and a little thinner than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's, but it's also heavier. IPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, while ZTE Axon 10 Pro works with Android 10 OS. The iPhone 13 Pro features a better processing power than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a brighter display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 resolution. ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has improved battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 29% bigger battery size.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is way more expensive than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.