Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 is better than the Google Pixel, having a overall score of 91.5 against 80.2. Although the iPhone 13 is somewhat heavier than Google Pixel, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer. Apple iPhone 13 counts with a greater performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 13 also has a 64-bit processor and a higher number of cores.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with a better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a better 1170 x 2532 resolution, a bigger screen and a just a bit higher pixel number in each inch in the display. IPhone 13 takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a worse resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photography and video.
Google Pixel's memory to install applications and games is very similar to the Apple iPhone 13 one, they have exactly the same internal storage. IPhone 13 features superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.