Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 has an overall score of 91.5, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4a's score of 82.9. IPhone 13 is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than Google Pixel 4a, although it is somewhat heavier. IPhone 13 comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 OS. Apple iPhone 13 has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a quite higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The iPhone 13 and the Google Pixel 4a both feature very similar memory capacity for applications and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone 13 has a better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone 13 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3227mAh battery size against 3140mAh. IPhone 13 counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.