Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is a lot better than Moto Z Force, getting a general score of 91.5 against 75.8. Apple iPhone 13 works with iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat OS. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 is a lot newer than Moto Z Force, it's just a little heavier and a bit thicker.
The iPhone 13 has a greater performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 13 also has a 64-bit processor and a larger number of cores. IPhone 13 counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
Moto Z Force features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 13, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force features a little better battery lifetime than iPhone 13, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto Z Force's camera is just as good as the camera in Apple iPhone 13, because although the Moto Z Force has slower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Although Apple iPhone 13 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 13, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.