Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.62 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 has an overall score of 91.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. The Apple iPhone 13 is an way older cellphone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Apple made it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone 13 has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A35 5G comes with Android 14 OS.
The Apple iPhone 13 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much brighter display, a just a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels. The iPhone 13 has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A35 5G captures better videos and photos than iPhone 13, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A35 5G and iPhone 13 count with very similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 13, because it has a 55 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.