Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A50, getting a 91.5 score against 83.8. IPhone 13 is a a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A50, but both are equally thin. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The iPhone 13 features a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has lesser processing cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 13, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features longer battery life than iPhone 13, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3227mAh.
Although iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A50. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A50, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.