Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 has a global score of 91.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A52's overall score of 90.7. IPhone 13's construction is a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy A52, although both of them were released only 6 months apart. Apple iPhone 13 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A52 has a much better storage for applications and games than iPhone 13, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a better processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has lesser RAM and lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3227mAh. The Galaxy A52 captures much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 13, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.