Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, having a score of 91.5 against 91.3. IPhone 13 is a a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, even when they were released with only 6 months difference. IPhone 13 works with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 OS.
The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a better processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 13 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a little better pixel count per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures greater photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much longer battery life than iPhone 13, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.