Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 is much better than the Galaxy A6, having a 91.5 score against 75.8. The iPhone 13 is a a little bit heavier device than the Galaxy A6, but both of them are equally thin. Apple iPhone 13 counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a larger amount of RAM.
The iPhone 13 has an incredibly better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher screen density, a bit larger display and a way better 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution. The Apple iPhone 13 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better video resolution.
The iPhone 13 has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 13 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 3227mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.