Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 has an overall score of 91.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s score of 85.2. Apple iPhone 13 is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). The iPhone 13 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a quite greater quantity of pixels in each display inch.
Apple iPhone 13 features a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 13, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with longer battery lifetime than iPhone 13, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy A9 (2018) captures just a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.