Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is just a bit better than the iPhone 13, getting a 97.6 score against 91.5. Galaxy Fold counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while iPhone 13 works with iOS 15.x operating system. Galaxy Fold's body is a little bit thinner than iPhone 13, but it's noticeably heavier and was released 2 years before.
IPhone 13 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 13 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 13, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back facing camera, the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 13, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 13, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity against 3227mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Apple iPhone 13, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Apple iPhone 13. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.