Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | PLS |
| 457 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 has a general score of 91.5, which is much better than the Galaxy M12's 80 overall score. Apple iPhone 13 comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy M12 has Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 13 is a notably thinner and notably lighter phone than Galaxy M12, even though both of them were released only 6 months apart.
The iPhone 13 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a lot greater pixels number per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
IPhone 13 has a quite superior performance than Galaxy M12, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Samsung Galaxy M12 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 13, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M12 also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy M12 has a superior battery life than iPhone 13, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3227mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.