Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-24 | -- |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 10.62 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 is much better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having a general score of 91.5 against 80.9. IPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 operating system. IPhone 13 features a little better performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has 2 less cores and doesn't have a GPU, and they both have a 64 bits CPU, the iPhone 13 also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than Apple iPhone 13, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. The iPhone 13 features a better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos.
IPhone 13 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S6 Active has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone 13, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.