Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is way better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having a score of 91.5 against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 13 body is notably newer, noticeably thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. The iPhone 13 counts with a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 also has a higher number of faster cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 13 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit lower screen density and a little lower 1170 x 2532px resolution, it also counts with much more brightness and a larger screen. The iPhone 13 features a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
IPhone 13 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone 13 also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and better video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with greater battery life than Apple iPhone 13, because it has a 24 percent greater battery size.
Although iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S7 Active, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.