Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a 91.5 score against 80.1. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. The Apple iPhone 13 body is newer, notably lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 13 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little worse 1170 x 2532 resolution and a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The iPhone 13 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the iPhone 13 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 13, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone 13, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Apple iPhone 13 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.