Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a global score of 91.5 against 81. The iPhone 13 is a newer device, and it's also much lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. The iPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 13 counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each display inch and a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a better storage for games and applications than iPhone 13, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Apple iPhone 13 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a larger aperture for better low light photography.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with better battery duration than iPhone 13, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 3227mAh.
Apple iPhone 13 costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.