Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a global score of 91.5 against 88.5. Even though Apple iPhone 13 is a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, it's just a little lighter and newer. Apple iPhone 13 works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with Android 12 operating system.
The iPhone 13 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone 13 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a little better number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 13, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images or videos in poorly lited environments, they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little longer battery lifetime than iPhone 13, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3227mAh.
IPhone 13 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.