Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-10-07 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight, Purple and Starlight | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 899.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 15 Bionic chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4325mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Plus has a global score of 92.2, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. The Apple iPhone 14 Plus is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also much thinner and notably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Apple iPhone 14 Plus comes with iOS 16.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than iPhone 14 Plus, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display pixel density. IPhone 14 Plus features a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 2 less cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bits processor.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features more memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 14 Plus, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone 14 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4325mAh.
The Apple iPhone 14 Plus captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back and a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Plus also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Apple iPhone 14 Plus not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.