Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a score of 94.9, which is much better than Google Pixel 2 XL's general score of 82.5. IPhone 14 Pro Max's construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 2 XL, but it's much heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a better performing processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit worse 1290 x 2796 pixels resolution and a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has higher video frame rates and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 XL and Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max have incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. IPhone 14 Pro Max has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4323mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.