Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a score of 94.9, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with iOS 16.x operating system, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 14 Pro Max's body is a lot newer and a bit thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Google Pixel 3a.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a greater processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a larger screen, a better 1290 x 2796px resolution and a little better pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4323mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.