Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a general score of 94.9, which is a lot better than Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. The iPhone 14 Pro Max body is a lot newer and a little thinner, but also way heavier than the Google Pixel 3a XL. IPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a XL works with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a quite superior performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and more RAM memory. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bigger screen, a little better pixels density and a better 1290 x 2796 resolution.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4323mAh battery size. IPhone 14 Pro Max captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.