Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a score of 94.9, which is much better than Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 general score. Even though the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is incredibly heavier than the Google Pixel 4a, it's a little thinner and also a lot newer. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with iOS 16.x OS, while Google Pixel 4a works with Android 11 OS.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a larger screen, a little better screen density and a higher resolution of 1290 x 2796px. The Google Pixel 4a's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as iPhone 14 Pro Max's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
IPhone 14 Pro Max features a quite better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with better video frame rate and a much better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4a, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.