Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting a global score of 94.9 against 87.5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but it is also notably heavier. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max works with iOS 16.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a 5G comes with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher 1290 x 2796 resolution and a quite greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
IPhone 14 Pro Max has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a lot more megapixels camera.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the iPhone 14 Pro Max, both have the same internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 14 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a 5G, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.