Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 16.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-09-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a score of 94.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x operating system, while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. IPhone 14 Pro Max is a notably newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's notably heavier and a little bit thicker.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a very superior performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM memory, a higher number of cores and a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a little bit better looking display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1290 x 2796 pixels, it also counts with a larger screen.
Moto Z Force features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone 14 Pro Max has superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4323mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro Max, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.