Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52, getting a 94.9 score against 90.7. IPhone 14 Pro Max's construction is newer and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A52's, but it is also a lot heavier. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, because it has a bit better count of pixels per screen inch, a quite bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1290 x 2796px.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A52 has just a bit longer battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4323mAh. Galaxy A52 captures a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.