Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has an overall score of 94.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G's global score of 91.3. The iPhone 14 Pro Max design is newer and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A52 5G's, although it is also much heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with iOS 16.x operating system, and Galaxy A52 5G counts with Android 12 operating system.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a better performing processor than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 14 Pro Max has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a little larger screen, a slightly better 1290 x 2796 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.