Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, with a overall score of 94.9 against 91.1. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A52s works with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 14 Pro Max body is newer and a bit thinner, but incredibly heavier than Samsung Galaxy A52s.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because it has a little higher pixels density, a little higher resolution of 1290 x 2796 pixels and a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera with way more megapixels. Galaxy A52s counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4323mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.