Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max is better than Galaxy A9 (2018), getting a overall score of 94.9 against 85.2. The iPhone 14 Pro Max is a incredibly heavier device than the Galaxy A9 (2018), but both are equally thin. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a quite better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a higher 1290 x 2796 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with faster video frame rate and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4323mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.