Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is slightly better than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max's overall score of 94.9. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has Android 9.0 Pie OS, while Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max works with iOS 16.x OS. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a incredibly older and somewhat heavier cellphone than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, but Samsung made it thinner anyway.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1290 x 2796 pixels and a greater amount of pixels per display inch. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold has a battery duration that is just as good as Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max's battery performance, although the Galaxy Fold also has a 1 percent larger battery size.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the iPhone 14 Pro Max. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get iPhone 14 Pro Max, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.