Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7, getting a 94.9 score against 79.5. The iPhone 14 Pro Max is a a lot heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7, but both are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy S7 counts with a little sharper display than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores , a 64 bits processing unit and a greater amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
IPhone 14 Pro Max features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. IPhone 14 Pro Max has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 44% more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy S7, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.