Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.8 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a 94.9 score against 75.8. The iPhone 14 Pro Max design is way newer and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little sharper screen than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher number of pixels per display inch.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory, a 64-bit processing unit and 2 more cores. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with higher video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. IPhone 14 Pro Max features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4323mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.